***In the Files***
Your question of “How mental health has affected the productivity of human beings. ” is a great one and there’s actually an entire field of psychology devoted to it –
Industrial Organizational Psychology (or I/O Psych) (Links to an external site.)
– it combines psychology and business.
Nice explanation of how mental health and productivity can be related.
Remember that a hypothesis is a testable prediction. You are hypothesizing that your DV (what you’re measuring) will be affected by your IV (what you’re manipulating or categorizing). So let’s take your hypotheses one at a time:
1. My hypothesis to the research problem can be categorized as; how employers at the workplace have handled the element of mental health among their employees has been ineffective. This is more of a statement than a prediction, right? What would be your DV and IV?
2. The second hypothesis would be that mental health has greatly affected the productivity of human beings in the workplace (Rouhanizadeh and Kermanshachi 2021). That may be a workable hypothesis because your have a DV (productivity) and an IV (mental health with levels good mental health and bad mental health – of course you’d have to define what these mean).
3. Finally, my last hypothesis would be that mental awareness needs to be enhanced to protect human beings from the effects of stress and depression. This is also a statement.
You didn’t mention how you would approach this question (how mental health and productivity) from the different perspectives laid out above and in your book – you should re-read that section and answer this again.
Finally you mention that “One thing that still confuses me is the fact that proper mental awareness needs the intervention of the organizations themselves and this remains a mirage.” Can you explain a bit more about this? Are you confused as to why institutions are not providing people with proper mental health awareness? Can you think of any reasons why not? (hint: stigma of mental health)
Course Number and Name
Think of a psychological question you might want to study. From the many different psychological perspectives, how might you phrase your question differently if you were approaching it from 2 different perspectives. Name your perspectives and question.
The psychological question that I would wish to study is the manner in which mental health affects the productivity of an individual. I would phrase this question in a manner that identifies both the problem and how it can be manner in which the problem affects the daily operations of human beings. For instance, I would frame it as; How mental health has affected the productivity of human beings. The perspectives in which I would use in answering this question is that of establishing the background to which this problem lies and eventually making the requisite proposals to the problem.
Either use your question from #1 or think of another question to study. Tell us your hypothesis and identify your DV(s) and IV(s). Make sure you operationalize both your DV(s) and IV(s). Design a study to answer the question. What would the results look like if they supported (not prove!) your original hypothesis?
My hypothesis to the research problem can be categorized as; employers have failed to assist their workers in dealing with mental health problems. The second hypothesis would be that mental health has greatly affected the productivity of human beings at the work place (Rouhanizadeh and Kermanshachi 2021). My last hypothesis would be that mental awareness needs to be enhanced to protect human beings from the effects of stress and depression. One of the results that would be realized if my original hypothesis is supported is that mental awareness programs would be incorporated in organizations hence making the workers more productive.
Tell us one thing you learned or were confused about in this week’s readings/DB post that you found interesting. Is there something that surprised you? Something that challenged your previous beliefs? Is there something that still confuses you?
One of the things that I learned in the past week’s readings is that mental health plays a critical role in the enhancement of productivity on individuals. The rationale behind this is that when mental health is properly managed, then individuals would be more productive than when it is poorly managed. The rationale behind this is that their brain would be more relaxed whenever they are performing their tasks hence enhancing their productivity. It is important to note that the concept of mental health has been categorized as one of the most important factors in determining whether an individual would be productive in his works. The concept that has challenged my previous beliefs is that which stipulates that for productivity to be enhanced, individuals need to promote the concept of mental health awareness. One thing that still confuses me is the fact that proper mental awareness needs the intervention of the organizations themselves and this still remains a mirage.
Rouhanizadeh, B., & Kermanshachi, S. (2021). Causes of the Mental Health Challenges in Construction Workers and Their Impact on Labor Productivity. In Tran-SET 2021 (pp. 16-26). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
This first week, we’re going to talk about the different psychological approaches and how scientific research is conducted in psychology/neuroscience. Psychological science seeks to understand behavior and psychologists have an arsenal of approaches through which to explain behavior: biological, clinical, social, evolutionary, psychoanalytic, cognitive, behavioral, sociocultural, etc. See the INFOGRAPHIC (Links to an external site.)on the very first page of your textbook, “Psychology’s Roots” for a brief description of each approach. I have also included a copy of this below.
Once we understand how the different approaches work, we then have to learn how to study psychological questions. Like any other science, we use the Scientific Method (Links to an external site.). I have also included a graphical representation of this below. A bit of explanation of some key terms (read your textbook or search for the italicized terms online):
· First, we develop a hypothesis based on prior research. Another way to think of a hypothesis is to think of it as a prediction.
· The hypothesis is phrased such that you are predicting that one variable (the dependent variable, DV) will be affected by another variable (independent variable, IV).
· I remember confusing the IV and DV when I first began learning about these variables. Think about it this way: your DV is what is being measureD; your IV is what is being manIpulated in or categorIzed.
· An example of an experiment might be this: We hypothesize that reaction time will be affected by one’s gender and by the modality of the stimulus that the person is reacting to. The DV would be reaction time because we are measuring it. The 2 IVs would be gender and stimulus modality. Gender would be an example of a variable that we categorize people into (male, female, other). Stimulus modality would be an example of a variable that we manipulated because you were randomly assigned to the light or sound stimulus.
· Whenever you have an experiment, you need to compare at least 2 conditions within the IV. Sometimes these are called the experimental and control conditions. In the example above, the gender IV has 3 conditions (or levels: males, female, other) and the stimulus modality IV has 2 conditions (or levels: visual and auditory).
· For both the DV and IV, it’s extremely important that each variable is well defined, or operationalized. If 2 experiments have different definitions of the same DV and they find different results, then you shouldn’t necessarily conclude that one experiment is “right” and one is “wrong”. For example, let’;s say you wanted to study why some people follow CDC guidelines while others don’t (the DV) based on their education level (the IV). You need to operationally define both the IV and DV. For the DV, does “following CDC guidelines” mean wearing masks out in public or following the 6 feet between people rule? For the IV, does “education level” mean finished high school versus not finished high school OR are you dividing people into the highest level of education obtained? One can argue about which definitions are better than others, but it’s still important to have them well defined.
· Another thing you have to take into account is sample size – how many people are you going to run through your study? When we do experiments, we want to make sure our results will generalize – meaning the results will apply to not only our sample (the people in our experiment), but to the population (the people you are trying to study). If your sample does not match the population you are trying to study, then the results can be called into question. We’re in an election year, so it’s important to consider election polls. Who is the country going to vote for President in November? That’s the million dollar question, right? Political consultants conduct polls to see if they can get an idea of where the country is heading. Imagine if the pollsters only asked Republicans who they were going to vote for in November. Odds are that the answer is President Trump. But they can’t generalize their polling data to the whole of the United States because their sample (i.e., Republicans) is not representative of the population (i.e. Republicans, Democrats, Independents, etc). THat’s why sometimes you see the breakdown of the different political parties and their responses – this is an attempt to capture the whole population, while also surveying components of it.
· Finally, we never say we prove or disprove a hypothesis. Despite what the commercials say (“scientifically proven to reduce acne!”), we rarely prove anything in science. A list of common misconceptions in science can be found here (Links to an external site.). Whether we are talking about psychology, biology, chemistry, or any other scientific field, scientific experiments don’t prove or disprove a given hypothesis – they provide evidence in favor of or against a particular hypothesis.
So with this all in mind, let’s get to this week’s DB to discuss different psychological approaches and the scientific method.
Type your answers to the following:
1. Think of a psychological question you might want to study. From the many different psychological perspectives, how might you phrase your question differently if you were approaching it from 2 different perspectives. Name your perspectives and question.
2. Either use your question from #1 or think of another question to study. Tell us your hypothesis and identify your DV(s) and IV(s). Make sure you operationalize both your DV(s) and IV(s). Design a study to answer the question. What would the results look like if they supported (not prove!) your original hypothesis?
3. Tell us one thing you learned or were confused about in this week’s readings/DB post that you found interesting. Is there something that surprised you? Something that challenged your previous beliefs? Is there something that still confuses you?
Why Choose Us
- 100% non-plagiarized Papers
- 24/7 /365 Service Available
- Affordable Prices
- Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
- Will complete your papers in 6 hours
- On-time Delivery
- Money-back and Privacy guarantees
- Unlimited Amendments upon request
- Satisfaction guarantee
How it Works
- Click on the “Place Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
- Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.